Skip to main content
· 11/13/2000

David B. Fite v. Digital Equipment Corporation

Citations

  • 232 F.3d 3
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 28966
  • 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 524
  • 2000 WL 1672806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if Valentine paused for a few moments and gave his name, he did not submit in any realistic sense . . . .”
  • “When horizontal price fixing causes 4 buyers to pay more, or sellers to receive less, than the prices 5 that would prevail in a market free of the unlawful trade 6 restraint, antitrust injury occurs.”
  • “When horizontal price fixing causes 4 buyers to pay more, or sellers to receive less, than the prices 5 that would prevail in a market free of the unlawful trade 6 restraint, antitrust injury occurs.”
  • “In our view, federal and Massachusetts law are now generally aligned ....”
  • district court made “no error in accepting the plea” when defendant said his medication did not affect his ability to understand the district court, and defendant’s answers during the plea “bore out the defendant’s claim of clearheadedness”
  • discussing pre-Reeves case l a w

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Boudin, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.