· 8/30/2007
E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus Project
Citations
- 500 F.3d 594
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20725
- 2007 WL 2445016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that damages may be determined from documentary evidence or detailed affidavits
- holding that these requirements apply to default judgments
- vacating permanent injunction imposed after default judgment as violative of Rule 65(d)
- Establishing liability by default \does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate.\
- “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”
- “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Kanne and Evans, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.