Seventh Circuit· 8/30/2007
E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus Project
Citations
- 500 F.3d 594
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20725
- 2007 WL 2445016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that damages may be determined from documentary evidence or detailed affidavits
- holding that these requirements apply to default judgments
- vacating permanent injunction imposed after default judgment as violative of Rule 65(d)
- Establishing liability by default \does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate.\
- “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”
- “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Kanne and Evans, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCSecond Circuit· 2011-05-04· cited 1,026×
- Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-05-09· cited 374×
- William Wehrs, Jr. v. Kevin WellsSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-08· cited 182×
- Hernandez v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeSeventh Circuit· 2011-02-24· cited 161×
- RK Co. v. SeeSeventh Circuit· 2010-09-22· cited 104×
- Bakery MacHinery & Fabrication, Inc. v. Traditional Baking, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2009-06-29· cited 104×
- Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 104×
- E360 Insight, Inc. v. Spamhaus ProjectSeventh Circuit· 2011-09-02· cited 79×
- Baker v. LindgrenSeventh Circuit· 2017-05-10· cited 69×
- Philos Technologies, Inc. v. Philos & D, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-06-15· cited 67×
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.C.D. California· 2007-10-16· cited 58×
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2010-06-04· cited 49×
- MetroPCS v. DevorN.D. Illinois· 2016-10-14· cited 29×
- Osthus v. Whitesell Corp.Eighth Circuit· 2011-04-22· cited 20×
- Utah Down Syndrome Foundation, Inc. v. Utah Down Syndrome Ass'nUtah Supreme Court· 2012-12-07· cited 20×
- Coach, Inc. v. 3D Designers InspirationsC.D. Illinois· 2014-09-29· cited 19×
- Gerald Judge v. Roland BurrisSeventh Circuit· 2010-09-24· cited 17×
- Kevin McCarthy v. Patricia FullerSeventh Circuit· 2015-12-18· cited 17×
- American Taxi Dispatch, Inc. v. American Metro Taxi & Limo Co.N.D. Illinois· 2008-10-20· cited 13×
- James White v. Tammie StanleySeventh Circuit· 2014-03-11· cited 13×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1,413×
- Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Second Circuit· 1999-07-09· cited 790×
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 628×
- In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqNinth Circuit· 1999-04-07· cited 615×
- United States v. Karl CunninghamSeventh Circuit· 2005-11-14· cited 550×
- Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1983-12-02· cited 417×
- Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, CaptainSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-31· cited 353×
- Dennis Garberg & Associates, Inc. v. Pack-Tech International Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1997-06-06· cited 300×
- United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciSeventh Circuit· 1989-07-13· cited 249×
- In Re: John W. Catt, Ii. Appeal Of: Shirley and Gerald HashSeventh Circuit· 2004-05-19· cited 225×
- System Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. M/V VIKTOR KURNATOVSKIYFifth Circuit· 2001-02-26· cited 222×
- Tas Distributing Company, Incorporated v. Cummins Engine Company, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2007-06-14· cited 164×
- Bally Export Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Balicar, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Juliano Internacional S.A., a Foreign CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 148×
- Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.Supreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 145×
- Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1996-01-08· cited 131×
- Truserv Corporation v. Flegles, Inc. And Alice Mae FlegleSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-12· cited 116×
- Robinson Engineering Company, Ltd. Pension Plan and Trust and R. W. Robinson & Associates Company Profit Sharing Plan v. Mark G. GeorgeSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-03· cited 96×
- Walgreen Company v. Sara Creek Property Company, B v. A/K/A Sara Creek Beta, and Phar-Mor CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1992-06-29· cited 91×
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary, H.U.DD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-13· cited 80×
Other cases named E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus Project
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.