Skip to main content
· 8/30/2007

E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus Project

Citations

  • 500 F.3d 594
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20725
  • 2007 WL 2445016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that damages may be determined from documentary evidence or detailed affidavits
  • holding that these requirements apply to default judgments
  • vacating permanent injunction imposed after default judgment as violative of Rule 65(d)
  • Establishing liability by default \does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate.\
  • “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”
  • “[A]lthough a default judgment establishes liability, it does not answer whether any particular remedy is appropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne and Evans, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.