RK Co. v. See

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the full amount of fees requested “[g]iven [the defendant’s] failure to raise specific objections to [the plaintiff’s] attorneys’ fees”
• stating 3 that a failure to request prejudgment interest in a final pretrial order did not result in waiver
• collecting cases holding that “the [Rule 17] defense is waived if it is first raised during or shortly before trial”
• noting that the presumption “is well-established in this circuit”
• discussing jurisdictional distinction between real party in interest doctrine and standing
• relying 20 on Rule 59(c) to resolve this contention, which provides a prevailing party will be 21 granted all the relief to which it is entitled, “even if the party has not demanded that 22 relief in its pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).