Seventh Circuit· 9/22/2010

RK Co. v. See

Citations

622 F.3d 846
77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 747
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19666
2010 WL 3655946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the full amount of fees requested “[g]iven [the defendant’s] failure to raise specific objections to [the plaintiff’s] attorneys’ fees”
stating 3 that a failure to request prejudgment interest in a final pretrial order did not result in waiver
collecting cases holding that “the [Rule 17] defense is waived if it is first raised during or shortly before trial”
noting that the presumption “is well-established in this circuit”
discussing jurisdictional distinction between real party in interest doctrine and standing
relying 20 on Rule 59(c) to resolve this contention, which provides a prevailing party will be 21 granted all the relief to which it is entitled, “even if the party has not demanded that 22 relief in its pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.