E360 Insight, Inc. v. Spamhaus Project

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that failure to comply with a district court’s order was a sufficient basis to impose sanctions under Rule 37(b)(2)(A)
• sanctions are reviewed \not in isolation but in light of 'the entire procedural history of the case.'\
• “[A] showing of willfulness, bad faith, or fault is necessary only when dismissal or default is imposed as a discovery sanction.”
• under Rule 37, “a showing of willfulness, bad faith, or fault is necessary only when dismissal or default is imposed as a discovery sanction.”
• “[W]e weigh not only the straw that finally broke the camel’s back, but all the straws that the recalcitrant party piled on over the course of the lawsuit.”
• “In other words, we weigh not only the straw that finally broke the camel’s back, but all the straws that the recalcitrant party piled on over the course of the lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).