Supreme Court of Delaware· 2/15/1974
Smith v. State
Citations
- 317 A.2d 20
- 1974 Del. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Fjairness, and indeed the integrity of the judicial process, make it imperative that jurors secure information about the case only as a corporate body in the courtroom.”
- “Jurors are expected to use all the experience, common sense and common knowledge they possess.”
- “We take occasion to emphasize that fairness, and indeed the integrity of the judicial process, make it imperative that jurors secure information about the case only as a corporate body in the courtroom.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Carey, Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- California v. RamosSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 1,071×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 256×
- Wiley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-02-13· cited 183×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-11-18· cited 172×
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-20· cited 149×
- Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-01-22· cited 107×
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-23· cited 89×
- Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-09-10· cited 82×
- State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-04-11· cited 74×
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-02-14· cited 65×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-04-22· cited 50×
- State v. LindseyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1977-04-05· cited 49×
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-10-09· cited 49×
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-02-22· cited 38×
- Van Arsdall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-11-19· cited 32×
- State v. RemmersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-11-23· cited 31×
- Reyes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-03-25· cited 31×
- Flonnory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-14· cited 30×
- Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-04· cited 24×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 727×
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-01-07· cited 474×
- Lovely v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1948-08-10· cited 213×
- The PEOPLE v. MarinoIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-03-24· cited 118×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-10-13· cited 59×
- Louis C. Smith v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1956-11-13· cited 31×
- State v. SchlagelSupreme Court of Missouri· 1973-02-12· cited 27×
- Lawley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1956-05-10· cited 21×
- State v. HalkoSuperior Court of Delaware· 1963-09-05· cited 18×
- Lecates v. LecatesSuperior Court of Delaware· 1937-02-08· cited 15×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1970-01-30· cited 9×
- People v. MarinoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1968-05-13· cited 8×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Russell Davis Mealey, Jr. v. The State of DelawareThird Circuit· 1974-01-02· cited 7×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1963-02-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.