Skip to main content

Wallace v. State

Citations

  • 956 A.2d 630
  • 2008 Del. LEXIS 351
  • 2008 WL 2952064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the mere recitation of a Delaware State Constitutional provision, without an analysis of the Jones factors, waives that argument on appeal
  • finding conclusory statement that sentence violates the Delaware Constitution waived claim in both in this Court and the Supreme Court
  • “The Eighth Amendment has been interpreted to prohibit only punishments that are disproportionate to the crime or are excessive.”
  • “The Eighth Amendment has been interpreted to prohibit only punishments that are disproportionate to the crime or are excessive.”
  • “the United States Supreme Court, in Roper, would not have recognized a sentence of life without parole as an acceptable alternative to death as a punishment for juveniles who commit [murder], if such a sentence would violate the Eighth Amendment”
  • “the United States Supreme Court, in Roper, would not have recognized a sentence of life without parole as an acceptable alternative to death as a punishment for juveniles who commit [murder], if such a sentence would violate the Eighth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.