Third Circuit· 4/26/2006
Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Citations
- 445 F.3d 1247
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10408
- 2006 WL 1084340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the federal officer statute is to be construed “broadly in favor of removal’'
- requiring the plaintiff “to provide ... facts to support each” of the elements of the federal contractor defense
- “After Harris, we no longer require defendants to take [a] blind leap.... ”
- district court's grant of attorney's fees and costs is a 18 final order subject to review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyNinth Circuit· 2014-04-25· cited 1,107×
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCNinth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 797×
- Lussier v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 297×
- Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na LlcNinth Circuit· 2013-02-25· cited 294×
- Connie Dietrich v. the Boeing CompanyNinth Circuit· 2021-10-01· cited 180×
- Michael S. Dahl David Scott Huber v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2007-02-28· cited 154×
- Laura Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCNinth Circuit· 2015-04-01· cited 134×
- Lorita Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2016-03-22· cited 80×
- Garrett v. CookTenth Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 38×
- Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-09-24· cited 32×
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Superior CourtN.D. California· 2007-08-22· cited 22×
- City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationSixth Circuit· 2007-04-19· cited 17×
- Federico v. Lincoln Military HousingE.D. Virginia· 2012-10-18· cited 17×
- Cabalce v. VSE Corp.D. Hawaii· 2013-01-31· cited 16×
- Watanabe v. LankfordD. Hawaii· 2010-01-15· cited 14×
- Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.D. Massachusetts· 2008-01-03· cited 11×
- Stiefel v. Bechtel Corp.S.D. California· 2007-04-10· cited 10×
- In Re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records LitigationN.D. California· 2007-01-18· cited 10×
- Merced Irrigation District v. County of MariposaE.D. California· 2013-04-23· cited 9×
- Fadhliah v. Société Air FranceC.D. California· 2013-10-01· cited 8×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationNinth Circuit· 1992-11-23· cited 4,522×
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 2,624×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court· 1908-11-16· cited 1,832×
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,208×
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court· 1976-01-21· cited 1,066×
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 653×
- Robert H. Harris v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company Kenneth L. BrownNinth Circuit· 2005-10-06· cited 568×
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 500×
- International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 480×
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 451×
- Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 428×
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 383×
- Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2006-04-25· cited 313×
- Adam Frederick Chapman v. Powermatic, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-09-21· cited 244×
- Colorado v. SymesSupreme Court· 1932-05-31· cited 160×
- Gay v. RuffSupreme Court· 1934-04-02· cited 99×
- Mater v. HolleyFifth Circuit· 1952-11-29· cited 64×
- Ely Valley Mines, Inc., Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Americo L. Campini, Leland DonahueNinth Circuit· 1981-05-11· cited 58×
- Robert L. Bradford v. Emmet E. HardingSecond Circuit· 1960-11-29· cited 57×
- Steven D. Willis v. Edward J. CraigNinth Circuit· 1977-06-14· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.