Tennessee v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutes do not conflict where one “in no way impairs the effectiveness of the” other
• warning that state interference with federal law may “paralyze the operations of the government”
• permitting removal of a criminal case against a federal revenue officer for homicide occurring during a distillery raid
• permitting removal of a criminal case against a federal revenue officer for homicide occurring during a distillery raid
• upholding the constitutionality of a statute like 28 U.S.C. § 1442 allowing federal officers to remove proceedings from state to federal court
• noting the need to prevent states from “paralyzftng]” operations of the federal government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).