Skip to main content
· 2/25/2013

Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 1136
  • 2013 WL 656851
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that demand letter plaintiff sent defendant before filing suit in lemon law case could not trigger second 30-day deadline
  • holding that a defendant company’s expertise in luxury automobiles did not create an obligation to supply information omitted by the plaintiff in reading the complaint
  • holding that a defendant is “not obligated to supply information which [the plaintiff] ha[s] omitted”
  • holding that where nothing in the complaint indicated the value of other class members' claims, defendant had no duty to examine its own records to make a determination
  • explaining that de minimis procedural defect, such as failing to attach complaint to notice 13 of removal, is curable even after 30-day removal period
  • finding that demand letter sent to defendant before the filing of the 18 initial complaint could not establish removability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Trott, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.