Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the federal officer statute is to be construed “broadly in favor of removal’'
• requiring the plaintiff “to provide ... facts to support each” of the elements of the federal contractor defense
• “After Harris, we no longer require defendants to take [a] blind leap.... ”
• district court's grant of attorney's fees and costs is a 18 final order subject to review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).