Skip to main content

Duncan and Smith v. State

Citations

  • 340 A.2d 722
  • 27 Md. App. 302
  • 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating generally that the defendant has the burden of going forward with the evidence at a suppression hearing, and “ ‘[t]he burden of persuasion remains throughout upon the one who at the outset has asserted the affirmative of the issue’ ”
  • “Where the evidence is inconclusive in [establishing an exception to the warrant requirement], the defendant wins.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morton, Thompson, Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Duncan and Smith v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.