Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/30/1975
Duncan and Smith v. State
Citations
- 340 A.2d 722
- 27 Md. App. 302
- 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating generally that the defendant has the burden of going forward with the evidence at a suppression hearing, and “ ‘[t]he burden of persuasion remains throughout upon the one who at the outset has asserted the affirmative of the issue’ ”
- “Where the evidence is inconclusive in [establishing an exception to the warrant requirement], the defendant wins.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morton, Thompson, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-04· cited 56×
- Gahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-26· cited 48×
- Herbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-02· cited 32×
- Hepple v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-04· cited 26×
- Tate and Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-15· cited 24×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-08· cited 21×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-06· cited 17×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-14· cited 16×
- Garrison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-03· cited 15×
- Conner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-07· cited 13×
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-28· cited 6×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-12· cited 5×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-06· cited 5×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12· cited 2×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-11-21
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1951-11-26· cited 1,320×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-12-07· cited 1,232×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 919×
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 745×
- People v. BerriosNew York Court of Appeals· 1971-05-12· cited 390×
Other cases named Duncan and Smith v. State
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.