Gahan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “This Court has said many times that Art. 26 is in pari materia with the Fourth Amendment.”
• stating that \This Court has said many times that Art. 26 is in pari materia with the Fourth Amendment.\
• Although the evidence was deemed admissible, a premise of the Court’s opinion was that an exclusionary rule is applicable for violations of Article 26
• Although the evidence was deemed admissible, a premise of the Court's opinion was that an exclusionary rule is applicable for violations of Article 26
• decisions of Supreme Court interpreting “kindred” federal constitutional provisions are entitled to “great respect” in interpreting Art. 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).