Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 5/23/2006

Duha v. Agrium, Inc.

Citations

  • 448 F.3d 867
  • 2006 WL 1389630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the ease-of-access favor weighed against dismissal when the bulk of the relevant documents were located in the United States and written or translated in English
  • commenting that “the actual ties to the home forum were much weaker in Kryvicky than in the present case”
  • noting that the abuse of discretion standard governs review of the denial of motions to supplement
  • holding the district court abused its discretion in giving undue weight to information about witnesses \asserted in [the defendant's] brief but not by affidavit or in any other record evidence\
  • reversing when the district court failed to indicate that it was giving heightened deference to a United States citizen's choice of forum
  • refusing to consider new argument on appeal regarding availability of an alternate forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Gibbons, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Duha v. Agrium, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.