Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/1/2002

DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.

Citations

  • 294 F.3d 21
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5622
  • 2000 WL 33725106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “related litigation” involving a different class of plaintiffs was due “little weight” in applying the Gilbert convenience factors
  • discussing an American interest in the events giving rise to the controversy, and surveying similar cases
  • discussing how the cost of transporting documentary evidence is now entitled to less weight absent an explanation why it would be burdensome
  • raising “questions as to [defendants’] underlying motives,” where defendants had previously moved before the MDL panel to transfer cases to the allegedly inconvenient district
  • listing as a public interest “avoiding difficult problems in conflict of laws and the application of foreign law”
  • determining the amount of weight to give the plaintiff’s selection based on the legitimacy of the plaintiff’s motivations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Cardamone, Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.