Pearl Saylor v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court may take judicial notice of its own records
• rejecting the argument that the plaintiff’s statute of limitations should start to run from the date the plaintiff became aware of its claim
• rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that the statute of limitations should start to run from the date the plaintiff became aware of its claim
• \The fact that appellants' new evidence might change the outcome of the case does not affect application of [the] claim preclusion doctrine.\
• “The fact that . . . new evidence might change the outcome of the case does not affect application of claim preclusion doctrine”
• \The fact that ... new evidence might change the outcome of the case does not affect application of claim preclusion doctrine\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).