Supreme Court of Colorado· 10/10/2000

Dudding v. Norton Frickey & Associates

Citations

11 P.3d 441
2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5710
2000 Colo. LEXIS 1170
2000 WL 1483728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

\Whether injustice results often will turn on whether a party engaged in some kind of wrongdoing.\
\[C]ourts will refuse quantum meruit recovery when expressly contrary to the provisions of the written contract between the parties.\
“An attorney-client relationship relies on trust and confidence between the client and the attorney,” which distinguishes that relationship “from other business relationships” and “creates a somewhat different framework for the analysis of quantum meruit claims.”
client terminated attorney’s services rendered pursuant to a contingency fee agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.