Skip to main content
· 7/14/1988

Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. Yates

Citations

  • 526 N.E.2d 1115
  • 172 Ill. App. 3d 519
  • 122 Ill. Dec. 576
  • 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 1017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, as good cause grounds, client’s refusal to pay past-due retainer fees and having filed a disciplinary complaint against the attorney
  • “We perceive no reason why the quantum meruit stand- ard should not also apply in situations where an attorney withdraws from representation of a client for good cause.”
  • “We perceive no reason why the quantum meruit stand- ard should not also apply in situations where an attorney withdraws from representation of a client for good cause.”
  • “We perceive no reason why the quantum meruit stand- ard should not also apply in situations where an attorney withdraws from representation of a client for good cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.