Skip to main content
· 1/30/2002

Mogavero v. Silverstein

Citations

  • 790 A.2d 43
  • 142 Md. App. 259
  • 2002 Md. App. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing implied-in-fact contracts from circumstances that give rise to claims for unjust enrichment
  • quasi-contract is a “rule of law that requires restitution to the -5- plaintiff of something that came into defendant’s hands but belongs to the plaintiff in some sense” (citation omitted)
  • “An implied-in-fact contract is a ‘true contract’ and ‘means that the parties had a contract that can be seen in their conduct rather than in an explicit set of words.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Eyler, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.