Skip to main content
· 9/9/2004

Bedard v. Martin

Citations

  • 100 P.3d 584
  • 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 1630
  • 2004 WL 2005973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that where plaintiff accepted payment “representing the full purchase price of the property, he lost his right to recover prejudgment interest”
  • upholding dismissal of negligent misrepresentation claim on summary judgment where plaintiff failed to check public record on ownership of property
  • “When each party prevails in part, the trial court generally must select one party as the overall winner for purposes of the fee-shifting agreement.”
  • under similar contractual provision, court must declare which party prevailed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russel, Nieto, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.