Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. Shidler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the parties had stipulated that Colorado law applies to the license agreement despite the Florida choice of law provision
• “Therefore, any loss to ISR is not ‘irreparable,’ as ISR wrote the clause and chose the amount that it felt would compensate its loss. I therefore conclude that ISR has failed to meet its burden to show irreparable loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).