Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 9/4/2002

Duckett v. Mullin

Citations

  • 306 F.3d 982
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18262
  • 2002 WL 31075013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order to succeed on his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective, [the petitioner] must first demonstrate that he would have been entitled under Strickland v. Washington to relief for the ineffectiveness of trial counsel.” (citation omitted)
  • rejecting habeas challenge to State’s first-stage victim-impact argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Lucero, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Duckett v. Mullin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.