Tenth Circuit· 4/26/2016

Rachel v. Troutt

Citations

820 F.3d 390
94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 816
100 Fed. R. Serv. 346
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7515
2016 WL 1638066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding claim not presented to the district court may not be raised on appeal for the first time
holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint expert witness where “the nature of [the plaintiff’s] underlying claim,” which was a deliberate indifference in medial treatment claim, was “not sufficiently complicated to require an independent medical expert”
“Courts are not authorized to appoint counsel in § 1983 cases; instead, courts can only ‘request’ an attorney to take a case.”
“Courts are not authorized to appoint counsel in § 1983 cases; instead, courts can only ‘request’ an attorney to take a case.”
“Courts are not authorized to appoint counsel in § 1983 cases; instead, courts can only ‘request’ an attorney to take a case.”
“Courts are not authorized to appoint counsel in § 1983 cases; instead, courts can only ‘request’ an attorney to take a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bácbarach, Gorsuch, McKay, Bacharach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.