· 3/15/2002
Duckett, Phillip E. v. Quick, Margaret
Citations
- 282 F.3d 844
- 350 U.S. App. D.C. 217
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4192
- 2002 WL 397646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no due process violation where “the BOP appears to have considered both the seriousness of Duckett’s violation [failure to report] and the mitigating factors he advanced,” such as his unawareness of the reporting requirement
- only revocation decisions “either totally lacking in evidentiary support or . . . so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair . . . would violate due process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.