Skip to main content
· 3/15/2002

Duckett, Phillip E. v. Quick, Margaret

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 844
  • 350 U.S. App. D.C. 217
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4192
  • 2002 WL 397646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no due process violation where “the BOP appears to have considered both the seriousness of Duckett’s violation [failure to report] and the mitigating factors he advanced,” such as his unawareness of the reporting requirement
  • only revocation decisions “either totally lacking in evidentiary support or . . . so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair . . . would violate due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.