Douglas v. Buder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a due process violation occurred because the record was “totally devoid of evidentiary support”
• holding that a finding that a person violated the conditions of his probation “was so totally devoid of evidentiary support as to be invalid under the Due Process Clause”
• holding that revocation of probation “totally devoid of support” violates due process
• holding that it was a deprivation of due process to find that a probationer had violated probation by failing to immediately report that he had received a traffic citation where such reporting was not required as a term of the probation
• recognizing substantive limit on revocation of probation absent evidence the probationer violated probation
• “holding that revocation of probation ‘totally devoid of support’ violates due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).