· 12/12/2007
Rockingham v. United States Parole Commission
Citations
- 523 F. Supp. 2d 38
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91026
- 2007 WL 4335653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A court's role in reviewing a parole revocation decision is limited. The court determines only whether the revocation decision was ‘either totally lacking in evidentiary support or [was] so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair.’ ”
- \The court determines only whether the [parole] revocation decision was 'either totally lacking in evidentiary support or [was] so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair.' \ (quoting Singletary v. Reilly , 452 F.3d 868 , 872 (D.C. Cir. 2006) )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.