Skip to main content
· 12/12/2007

Rockingham v. United States Parole Commission

Citations

  • 523 F. Supp. 2d 38
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91026
  • 2007 WL 4335653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A court's role in reviewing a parole revocation decision is limited. The court determines only whether the revocation decision was ‘either totally lacking in evidentiary support or [was] so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair.’ ”
  • \The court determines only whether the [parole] revocation decision was 'either totally lacking in evidentiary support or [was] so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair.' \ (quoting Singletary v. Reilly , 452 F.3d 868 , 872 (D.C. Cir. 2006) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.