Skip to main content
· 9/27/2006

Rickels v. State

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 759
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1879
  • 2006 WL 2741628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that in a probation revocation hearing, the trial court could infer ultimate facts from basic, proven facts
  • recognizing that in a probation revocation hearing, the trial court could infer ultimate facts from basic, proven facts
  • holding that appellate review of an order revoking community supervision is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion
  • recognizing that in a probation revocation hearing, the trial court could infer ultimate facts from basic, proven facts
  • holding that evidence is sufficient to support a revocation where the greater weight of the credible evidence before the court sup- ports a reasonable belief that a condition of probation has been violated
  • holding that evidence is sufficient to support a revocation where the greater weight of the credible evidence before the court sup- ports a reasonable belief that a condition of probation has been violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.