Skip to main content

Montoya v. State

Citations

  • 291 S.W.3d 420
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877
  • 2009 WL 1873354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court is “in a better position to determine whether [the defendant] was presently competent”
  • stating that the standard of review for a competency determination is abuse of discretion because “those who observed the behavior of the defendant at the hearing were in a better position to determine whether [ ]he was presently competent”
  • noting that statute focuses on defendant's present ability
  • stating “[w]e have held that instances of depression are not an indication of incompetency and that past mental-health issues raise the issue of incompetency only if there is evidence of recent severe mental illness, at least moderate retardation, or bizarre acts by the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.