Driskill v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we may not reverse summary judgment ruling on issue not expressly and timely presented to trial court in written response
• finding expert testimony was required to ”bridg[e] the analytical gap” in determining cause-in-fact of an injury in face of no-evidence motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).