Skip to main content
· 9/21/2010

Ritchey v. Pinnell

Citations

  • 324 S.W.3d 815
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 7720
  • 2010 WL 3632784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that pre-purchase home inspection did not negate reliance and causation because there was no evidence that inspection revealed whether proper permit was obtained
  • holding fraud claim was not precluded by buyer’s independent inspection of house because it did not reveal defects at issue
  • discussing differences between standards adopted by Dallas and San Antonio Courts of Appeals
  • discussing differences between standards adopted by Dallas and San Antonio Courts of Appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, Carter, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.