· 9/21/2010
Ritchey v. Pinnell
Citations
- 324 S.W.3d 815
- 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 7720
- 2010 WL 3632784
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that pre-purchase home inspection did not negate reliance and causation because there was no evidence that inspection revealed whether proper permit was obtained
- holding fraud claim was not precluded by buyer’s independent inspection of house because it did not reveal defects at issue
- discussing differences between standards adopted by Dallas and San Antonio Courts of Appeals
- discussing differences between standards adopted by Dallas and San Antonio Courts of Appeals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morriss, Carter, Moseley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.