Bostrom Seating, Inc. v. Crane Carrier Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because no evidence showed that seat was defective and seat manufacturer did not participate in integration of seat into truck design, seat manufacturer was not liable for defect in truck
• holding that “if the component-part manufacturer does not participate in the integration of the component into the finished product, it is not liable for defects in the final product if the component itself is not defective”
• holding that, because no evidence showed that seat was defective and seat manufacturer did not participate in integration of seat into truck design, seat manufacturer was not liable for defect in truck
• holding that comments from deposition read out of context at trial were not evidence of a product defect when the comments were considered in context and clarified by the expert who made them
• stating that one must act as a mere innocent conduit for the product to receive indemnity
• stating that one must act as a mere innocent conduit for the product to receive indemnity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).