S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deposition testimony that the “actual damages” exceeded the jurisdictional amount constituted “other paper”
• finding that “an affidavit created by the defendant and based on the defendant’s subjective knowledge cannot convert a non- removable action into a removable one”
• do not defeat motion for summary judgment by using affidavit which impeaches, without explanation, sworn testimony
• “[A]n affidavit created by the defendant and based on the defendant’s subjective knowledge cannot convert a non-removable action into a removable one.”
• “We find that an affidavit created by the defendant and based on the defendant’s subjective knowledge cannot convert a non-removable action into a removable one. We hold that the affidavit, created entirely by the defendant, is not ‘other paper’ under section 1446(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).