Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an “agency’s failure to connect permissibly its facts and its holding is fatal to the agency’s order”
• explaining that an agency must set out the reasoning that leads it from the facts that it has found to the conclusions that it draws from those facts
• explaining that agencies “are required to demonstrate in their opinions the reasoning that leads the agency from the facts that it has found to the conclu- sions that it draws from those facts” (emphasis omitted)
• addressing line of decisions since 1975 holding that agencies “are required to demonstrate in their opinions the reasoning that leads the agency from the facts that it has found to the conclusions that it draws from those facts” (emphases in original)
• addressing the line of decisions since 1975 holding that agencies “are required to demonstrate in their opinions the reasoning that leads the agency from the facts that it has found to the conclusions that it draws from those facts” (emphases in original)
• addressing the line of decisions since 1975 holding that agencies “are required to demonstrate in their opinions the reasoning that leads the agency from the facts that it has found to the conclusions that it draws from those facts” (emphases in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).