Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the consequences of an order denying a petitioner's application to reinstate his teaching license \would be a profound impact on * * * the ability of an individual to pursue a chosen profession\
• remanding to agency for reconsideration where some of the factual findings on which agency relied in reaching ultimate conclusion were not supported by substantial evidence under ORS 183.482(8)(c)
• describing standard for determining propriety of relying on hearsay as substantial evidence
• remanding Nonprecedential Memo Op: 325 Or App 429 (2023) 433 for reconsideration where some of the factual findings on which the agency relied in reaching its ultimate conclusion were not supported by substantial evidence
• discussing admissibility of hearsay evidence under ORS 183.450(1) in administrative proceeding
• “[The declarants] were readily available to be called as witnesses. No reason was given [as to] why they did not testify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-21· cited 9×