Skip to main content

Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Citations

  • 633 P.2d 846
  • 53 Or. App. 941
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for reconsideration where the Psychiatric Security Review Board had improperly relied on facts submitted by board members
  • discussing the Psychiatric Security Review Board’s expertise and adjudicative role
  • “It is one thing, however, to say that an agency may employ its experience and expertise to evaluate and understand evidence and quite another to allow it to use its special knowledge as a substitute for evidence presented at a hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Joseph, Thornton, Buttler, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.