Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that substantial reason “is the appropriate standard of review”
• requiring board adherence to principles set out in ORS 183.482(8), including principle that orders reflect rational connection between agency’s reasoning and its conclusions
• requiring the board to provide “some kind of an explanation connecting the facts of the case * * * and the result reached”
• stating that substantial reason “is the appropriate standard of review.”
• requiring the board to provide “some kind of an explanation connecting the facts of the case * * * and the result reached”
• requiring board adherence to principles set out in ORS 183.482(8), including principle that orders reflect rational connection between agency’s reasoning and its conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).