Skip to main content
· 8/10/2005

Salosha, Inc. v. Lane County

Citations

  • 117 P.3d 1047
  • 201 Or. App. 138
  • 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the standard of review applicable to writs sought under ORS 34.040(l)(c) (lack of substantial evidence)
  • “An unreasoned order substantially affects a party’s statutory right to meaningful judicial review[.]”
  • “Where a petitioner argues that an order is not supported by substantial evidence, a court will also review the order for substantial reason to ensure that the order articulates the reasoning that leads from the facts found to the conclusions drawn.”
  • “Where a petitioner argues that an order is not supported by substantial evidence, a court will also review the order for substantial reason to ensure that the order articulates the reasoning that leads from the facts found to the conclusions drawn”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.