Dr. Dale Thurman v. Pfizer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the fiduciary of an ERISA plan” under § 1132(a)(2
• misrepresentation claims not preempted as they did not depend on an interpretation of the given plan or concern the ERISA benefit scheme
• “A district court considering a defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) must construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and accept the plaintiff’s allegations as true.”
• “A district court considering a defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) must construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and accept the plaintiff’s allegations as true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).