Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where employer allegedly misrepresented facts so that employee would miss a claims deadline, that employee was nonetheless bound by the deadline
• holding a claim is not preempted because the damages calculation would require reference to the plan
• holding appellant forfeited consideration of an issue where he failed to include it in his statement of issues presented for review and only cursorily mentioned it in his brief
• indicating claims filed in June 1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).