Skip to main content
· 3/4/2005

Penny/ohlmann/nieman, Inc. v. Miami Valley Pension Corp.

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 692
  • 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1737
  • 95 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1363
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3623
  • 2005 WL 492206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ERISA governs relations between the traditional ERISA plan entities, including the plan and fiduciaries
  • holding that a negligent misrepresentation claim against a “non-fiduciary service provider” does not implicate ERISA, as it does not require a court to evaluate whether the service provider violated the terms of an ERISA-governed plan
  • holding that a negligent misrepresentation claim against a “non- fiduciary service provider” does not implicate ERISA, as it does not require a court to evaluate whether the service provider violated the terms of an ERISA-governed plan
  • holding that state laws providing \alternative enforcement mechanisms\ are preempted
  • holding that ERISA preempts state laws that “provide alternate enforcement mechanisms”
  • holding that state laws providing “alternative enforcement mechanisms” are preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Moore, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.