Best-Willie v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the ALJ sufficiently discusses the medical evidence, the record as a whole may provide support for a physician’s opinion as consistent with the evidence, even if there was not a contemporaneous discussion
• stating that the claimant’s husband’s letter was cumulative of the claimant’s testimony about her pain
• “Having reasonably discounted the opinions of Drs. Hall and Charlat, the ALJ did not err in failing to include additional limitations in her RFC assessment.”
• “Having reasonably discounted the opinions of Drs. Hall and Charlat, the ALJ did not err in failing to include additional limitations in her RFC assessment.”
• “Having reasonably discounted the opinions of Drs. Hall and Charlat, the ALJ did not err in failing to include additional limitations in her RFC assessment.”
• “Having reasonably discounted the opinions of Drs. Hall and Charlat, the ALJ did not err in failing to include additional limitations in her RFC assessment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).