Skip to main content
· 7/7/1993

Doe v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Citations

  • 855 S.W.2d 248
  • 1993 WL 184031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff claimed she had to commumcate to prospective employers false positive drug test
  • “While we are aware of non-Texas authority allowing ‘self-defamation’ claims under only a foreseeability test, the Texas Supreme Court has yet to adopt or approve such a broad cause of action. We decline to do so.”
  • “As a general rule, mental anguish does not constitute an element of damages that may be recovered in an action either for breach of contract or for a tort based on a right growing out of a breach of contract.”
  • refusing to recognize the doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Jones, Kidd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.