Downs v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s ownership of the mark “Scott” as applied to paper products does not preclude defendant’s use of “Scott” on furniture polish
• “We think it ... relevant that petitioners have in these proceedings played dog in the manger with respect to alerting the agency to reasons why [certain sites] might be advantageous for the proposed nuclear plant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).