Rayonier Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that movant show a “particular need for protection”
• “[T]he burden of justifying the confidentiality of 10 each and every document sought to be covered by a protective order remains on the party seeking 11 the protective order; any other conclusion would turn Rule 26(c) on its head.”
• “[T]he burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered 28 by a protective order remains on the party seeking the protective order; any other conclusion would turn 1 Rule 26(c) on its head.”
• “[T]he burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered 27 by a protective order remains on the party seeking the protective order; any other conclusion would turn 28 Rule 26(c) on its head.”
• “[T]he 18 burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered by a protective 19 order remains on the party seeking the protective order; any other conclusion would turn Rule 26(c) on 20 its head.”
• “[T]he 5 burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered by a protective 6 order remains on the party seeking the protective order; any other conclusion would turn Rule 26(c) on 7 its head.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).