· 12/28/1979
Mohammad Sami v. United States of America
Citations
- 617 F.2d 755
- 199 U.S. App. D.C. 173
- 57 A.L.R. Fed. 245
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that examination of the legislative history shows that the foreign activities exception \does not apply if the wrongful acts or omissions complained of occur in the United States\ (emphasis added)
- noting that examination of the legislative history shows that the foreign activities exception “does not apply if the wrongful acts or omissions complained of occur in the United States” (emphasis added)
- looking to where “the act or omission complained of occurred” in applying § 2680(k)
- concluding U.S. National Central Bureau officers were within § 2680(h
- concluding U.S. National Central Bureau officers were within § 2680(h
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGowan, Leventhal, Wald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.