Supreme Court· 5/7/1956
Hatahley v. United States
Citations
- 351 U.S. 173
- 76 S. Ct. 745
- 100 L. Ed. 2d 1065
- 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1627
- 100 L. Ed. 1065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an agent acting outside his delegated authority is not protected by the discretionary function exception
- holding that the discretionary function does not apply where the decision-maker lacks authority
- holding that the FTCA allows the United States to be sued for trespass
- applying Utah law to a claim by Navajo Indians for Government destruction of their horses
- recognizing dictionary definitions have no application where terms are statutorily defined
- federal agents' confiscations of plaintiffs' horses without notice as required by law were \wrongful trespasses\ outside the scope of the discretionary function exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.