Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/7/1956

Hatahley v. United States

Citations

  • 351 U.S. 173
  • 76 S. Ct. 745
  • 100 L. Ed. 2d 1065
  • 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1627
  • 100 L. Ed. 1065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an agent acting outside his delegated authority is not protected by the discretionary function exception
  • holding that the discretionary function does not apply where the decision-maker lacks authority
  • holding that the FTCA allows the United States to be sued for trespass
  • applying Utah law to a claim by Navajo Indians for Government destruction of their horses
  • recognizing dictionary definitions have no application where terms are statutorily defined
  • federal agents' confiscations of plaintiffs' horses without notice as required by law were \wrongful trespasses\ outside the scope of the discretionary function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.