Skip to main content
· 7/3/2003

Double Diamond, Inc. v. Van Tyne

Citations

  • 109 S.W.3d 848
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 5729
  • 2003 WL 21512624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criticism of real-estate development’s facilities was not defamatory
  • holding statement of opinionated criticism not actionable
  • holding statement of opinionated criticism not actionable
  • unflattering opinions or observations are not actionable defamation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices Morris, Moseley and Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.