Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/10/1983
Dorsey v. State
Citations
- 454 A.2d 353
- 295 Md. 217
- 1983 Md. LEXIS 194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if the judge has no personal knowledge of some aspect of the contemptuous behavior and must fill in the gaps with evidence from an outside source, then direct contempt summary proceedings are not appropriate
- holding that if the judge has no personal knowledge of some aspect of the contemptuous behavior and must fill in the gaps with evidence from an outside source, then direct contempt summary proceedings are not appropriate
- explaining that direct contempt occurs when the contemptuous action occurs “within the sensory perception of [the] presiding judge” and “interrupts the order of the courtroom”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-07· cited 50×
- In Re Special Investigation No. 281Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-04· cited 25×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-13· cited 18×
- Bahena v. FosterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-16· cited 12×
- Hartlove v. Maryland School for BlindCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-30· cited 12×
- Eagan v. AydCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-08-04· cited 10×
- Espinosa v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-05· cited 8×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-18· cited 7×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-14· cited 4×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-13· cited 4×
- Dickson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-28· cited 2×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court· 1888-11-12· cited 567×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 208×
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court· 1873-10-01· cited 140×
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-17· cited 117×
- Brodak v. BrodakCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-21· cited 62×
- Middlebrook v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1876-01-15· cited 54×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-05-06· cited 43×
- Cant v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-09· cited 36×
- Brown v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-08· cited 33×
- Harford County Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-12-09· cited 23×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-22· cited 13×
- Ex parte WisdomMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-04-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.