Skip to main content
· 12/9/1977

Harford County Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

Citations

  • 380 A.2d 1041
  • 281 Md. 574
  • 1977 Md. LEXIS 617
  • 97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘Where the terms of an injunction are not specific and definite, a defendant will not be punished for contempt.’ ”
  • “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.”
  • terms of order ruled plain and not overly vague where defendants were required to “take whatever affirmative action is necessary to bring about a cessation of the strike”
  • “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.” (internal citations omitted)
  • “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.”
  • “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.