· 12/9/1977
Harford County Education Ass'n v. Board of Education
Citations
- 380 A.2d 1041
- 281 Md. 574
- 1977 Md. LEXIS 617
- 97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘Where the terms of an injunction are not specific and definite, a defendant will not be punished for contempt.’ ”
- “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.”
- terms of order ruled plain and not overly vague where defendants were required to “take whatever affirmative action is necessary to bring about a cessation of the strike”
- “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.” (internal citations omitted)
- “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.”
- “[I]t is fundamental that a preliminary injunction does not issue as a matter of right, but only where it is necessary in order to preserve the status quo.” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.