Supreme Court· 10/1/1873
Ex Parte Robinson
Citations
- 86 U.S. 513
- 22 L. Ed. 205
- 19 Wall. 513
- 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1456
Syllabus
<p>An appeal does not lie to this court from an order of the District Court disbarring an attorney. The remedy of the party, if any, is by mandamus. See the case as reported, supra.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court could not disbar an attorney under the predecessor, to § 401
- \Before a judgment disbarring an attorney is rendered he should have ... ample opportunity of explanation and defence.\
- \Before a judgment disbarring an attorney is rendered he should have notice of the grounds of complaint against him and ample opportunity of explanation and defence.\
- “The moment the courts of the United States were called into existence and invested with jurisdiction over any subject, they became possessed of [certain inherent] power.”
- “Before a judgment disbarring an attorney is rendered he should have . . . ample opportunity of explanation and defence.”
- “Before a judgment disbarring an attorney is rendered he should have notice of the grounds of complaint against him and ample opportunity of explanation and defence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clifford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Third Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 236×
- United States v. Richard A. HornFirst Circuit· 1994-07-25· cited 206×
- Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterNinth Circuit· 2005-03-03· cited 146×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1985-01-31· cited 131×
- In the Matter of Hipp, Inc., Debtor. Thomas J. Griffith, Trustee v. David OlesFifth Circuit· 1990-04-18· cited 116×
- Brenda Chilcutt v. United States of America, Randell P. Means, in His Individual CapacityFifth Circuit· 1993-12-22· cited 113×
- Crowe v. SmithFifth Circuit· 1998-08-12· cited 108×
- In Re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation MdlThird Circuit· 1997-12-22· cited 108×
- Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.Fifth Circuit· 1998-05-12· cited 90×
- Kleiner v. First National BankEleventh Circuit· 1985-01-31· cited 89×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-09-22· cited 84×
- Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television and Radio, Inc., and G. Russell Chambers, and Richard A. Curry, Edwin A. McCabe and A.J. Gray, IIIFifth Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 82×
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyNinth Circuit· 2014-12-19· cited 75×
- In Re Sequoia Auto Brokers, Ltd., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1987-09-14· cited 72×
- STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 72×
- In Re Darwin Charles BrownD.C. Circuit· 1971-11-02· cited 65×
- Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.E.D. New York· 2008-04-23· cited 62×
- United States v. AleoSixth Circuit· 2012-05-15· cited 57×
- United States v. MoussaouiFourth Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 50×
- David J. Gallo, Movant-Appellant v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Real Party in Interest-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2003-12-09· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.