Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the community notification provisions were not excessive because “the community-notification statute is sensitive concerning the varying degrees of risk presented by different offenders by tailoring the dissemination of information to the jeopardy posed”
• stating that under Arizona’s registration statutes, the “offender is not labeled as more culpable than he was before”
• finding “ample indication” state legislature “intended to protect communities” through sex offender registration and community notification statutes
• stating in dicta that persons convicted of committing sex offenses have a reduced expectation of privacy because of the public’s interest in public safety in determining that sex offender registration statute did not violate prohibition on ex post facto laws
• “[I]t serves judicial economy to address a matter of first impression which is certain to occur again.”
• “[I]t serves judicial economy to address a matter of first impression which is certain to occur again.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).